|
Aeromagnetic measurements
include a noise component from the aircraft as well as the signal of
interest arising from the underlying geology. This magnetic interference
from the aircraft can be modeled with components representing permanent and
induced magnetization as well as the effect of eddy currents induced in the
conductive surface of the wings and fuselage. An additional source of
measurement error is the heading effect associated with optically pumped
sensors, particularly the popular cesium magnetometers. Depending on the
orientation of the sensor within the earth’s field, several nT of
variation is typical. Scott Hogg & Associates have developed a
compensation system to measure, calibrate and remove these errors from raw
aeromagnetic data. The calibration process requires the aircraft to carry
out a standard sequence of pitches, rolls and yaws on four headings. This
data is analyzed and the error model calibrated for up to 4 sensors
simultaneously. The calibration coefficients are then applied to the survey
data post flight. Both the calibration and the correction software is
available as a GX routine for ease of use within the popular Geosoft
environment.
Presented below is a sample calibration
flight, carried out by a Goldak Airborne Surveys TriMaxial aircraft,
equipped with 4 sensors. The process analyses the input from 3 fluxgate
sensors, Fx, Fy and Fz and the raw magnetic signal TFraw1. The process
identifies the error to be compensated, TFerr1, and develops a model that
predicts the correction needed, TFcor1, to cancel the error. In the example
below the difference between the actual and predicted error is minimal and
the profiles superimpose. The difference between actual and predicted error,
DifCor, shows an average peak to peak excursion within 0.03 to 0.05 nT with
one motion near the start of the profile reaching a maximum peak to peak
variation of 0.35 nT. The figure of merit for the aircraft as compensated
here is 0.8 nT, a very good result.
|